civil procodure code

transfer of property act 1882

Entry 6 of List III (Concurrent List) of Seventh Schedule to Constitution reads ‘Transfer of property other than agricultural land; registration of deeds and documents’. Thus, transfer of property  is a ‘Concurrent Subject’. Both Central and State Government can take legislative action in respect of transfer of property except that relating to agricultural land. [Transfer of agricultural land is a State subject under Entry 18 of List II (State List)]

The Act proposes to prescribe law relating to transfer of property by act of parties. Thus, the Act applies only to voluntary transfer or property. It does not cover transfer of property by ‘will’.

Section 4 of the Act clarifies that the part of the Act which relates to contracts shall be taken as part of Indian Contract Act and some specified sections shall be read as supplemental to Indian Registration Act. Thus, the Act is complimentary to Indian Contract Act and Registration Act. The Act applies both to movable and immovable property.

Transfer of Property – ‘Transfer of Property’ means an act by which a living person conveys property, in present or future, to one or more living persons, or to himself or to himself and one or more other living persons. ‘Living person’ includes a company or association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not. [section 5]. - - The property may be movable or immovable, present or future. - - Such transfer can be made orally, unless transfer in writing is specifically required under any law. [section 9]. - - Any person competent to contract and entitled to transferable property, or authorised to dispose of transferable property on his own, is competent to transfer such property. The property can be transferred wholly or in part. It can be transferred either absolutely or conditionally. Such transfer can be only to the extent and in manner allowed and prescribed by law. [section 7].

Sale of immovable property – ‘Sale’ is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised or part-paid and part promised. Such transfer in case of tangible immovable property of value of Rs 100 or more can be made only by a registered instrument. Delivery of tangible immovable property is made when seller places the buyer, or such person as he directs, in possession of property. Thus, delivery of immovable property can be only by handing over actual possession to buyer or to a person authorised by buyer. [section 54].

Mortgage – ‘Mortgage’ is the transfer of an interest in specific immovable property for the purpose of securing payment of money advanced or to be advanced, by way of loan or an existing or future debt. The transferor is called a mortgagor, the transferee a mortgagee, the principal money and interest of which payment is secured are called as ‘mortgage money’ and the instrument by which transfer is effected is called a mortgage-deed.  [section 58(a)]. Mortgage can be * simple mortgage * Mortgage by conditional sale * Usufructuary mortgage * English Mortgage * Mortgage by deposit of title deeds or * Anomalous mortgage.

When mortgagee can take possession of mortgaged property in case of default - Under provisions of section 69 of Transfer of Property Act, mortgagee can take possession of mortgaged property and sale the same without intervention of Court only in case of English mortgage, if there is default of payment of mortgage money. In addition, mortgagee can take possession of mortgaged property where there is specific provision in mortgage deed and the mortgaged property is situated in towns of Kolkata, Chennai or Mumbai. In other cases, possession of property can be taken only with intervention of Court. [English Mortgage is where mortgagor binds himself to repay the mortgaged money on a certain date, and transfers the mortgaged property absolutely to the mortgagee, but subject to a proviso that he will re-transfer the property to the mortgagor upon payment of the mortgage-money as agreed. - section 58(e) of Transfer of Property Act].

Charge – Where immovable property of one person is, by act of parties or by operation of law, made security for payment of money to another, and the transaction does not amount to a mortgage, the latter person is said to have a charge on the property; and all provisions in respect of ‘simple mortgage’ will apply to such charge. [section 100]. [Mortgage is not a ‘charge’ as per section 100 of Transfer of Property Act, but it will be a ‘charge’ for purpose of registration under Companies Act, as per section 124 of Companies Act].

A 'charge' is not 'mortgage'. In every mortgage, there is 'charge', but every charge is not a mortgage. Section 100 of Transfer of Property Act states that if immovable property is made as security for payment of money and if it does not amount to mortgage, then the later person is said to have a charge on property. However, a 'charge' does not create an interest in the property. - Dattatreya Mote v. Anand Datar - (1994) 2 SCC 799. Thus, no particular form is necessary to create 'charge'.  [However, for purpose of registration under Companies Act, ‘charge’ includes mortgage].

Lease of immovable property – A lease of immovable property is transfer of a right to enjoy such property, made for a certain time, express or implied, or in perpetuity. Such transfer of right should be in consideration of a price paid or promised, or of money, or a share of crops, or service or anything of value, to be rendered periodically or on specified occasions to the transferor by the transferee, who accepts the transfer on such terms. [section 105]. Lease of property from year to year or for any term exceeding one year can be made only by registered instrument. [section 107].

Exchange – When two persons mutually transfer the ownership of one thing for the ownership of another, neither thing or both things being money only, the transaction is called an ‘exchange’. [section 118].

Actionable Claim – ‘Actionable claim’ means a claim to any debt or to any beneficial in movable property not in possession (either actual or constructive) of the claimant. The debt should be other than a debt secured by mortgage of immovable property or pledge of movable property. The claim should be such be such as Civil Court would recognise as affording grounds for relief. Such debt or beneficial interest be existent, accruing, conditional or contingent. [section 3 para 6]. Such transfer of an actionable claim shall be effected only by execution of an instrument is writing. [section 130]. - - One normal example is that receivable from a person is ‘actionable claim’, which can be transferred to another (e.g. one bank may transfer some of its receivables to another)

specific Reliefs Act 1963

Specific Reliefs Act is complimentary to provisions of Contract Act and Transfer of Property Act, as the Act applies both to movable property and immovable property. The Act applies in cases where Court can order specific performance of a contract or act. As per section 4, specific relief can be granted only for purpose of enforcing individual civil rights and not for the mere purpose of enforcing a civil law.

‘Specific performance’ means Court will ask the party to perform his part of agreement, instead of asking him to pay damages to other party.

Recovering possession of immovable property –  * A person who is entitled to possession of a specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided in Code of Civil Procedure. (section 5) * If any person is disposed without his consent, of immovable property otherwise than by course of law, he can recover possession, even if any other title is set up in such suit. Such suit shall be brought within 6 months. No suit can be filed against Government for recovery of possession. [section 6]. - - That is why it is termed as ‘possession is 9 points in law’. Even an unlawful possession of immovable property can be taken away only by lawful means and not forcefully.

Recovering possession of specific movable property –  * A person who is entitled to possession of a specific movable property may recover it in the manner provided in Code of Civil Procedure. (section 7) * If any person is in possession or control of a specific movable property of which he is not owner, he can be compelled to specifically deliver it to the person entitled to immediate possession, in cases specified in section 6.  - - Thus, if a person holding the movable property is owner of goods, he cannot be compelled to deliver it to other. However, in other cases, he can be compelled to deliver it, even if other person is not owner, as long as he is entitled to its immediate possession.

Specific performance of contract – Specific performance of contract can be ordered, at discretion of Court, in following cases – (a) Where there exists no standard for ascertaining damage caused by the non-performance of act agreed to be done or (b) When the act agreed to be done is such that compensation in money for non-performance will not give sufficient relief. [section 10]. As per explanation (ii) to section 10, breach of contract in respect of movable property can be relieved (by paying damages) unless the property is not an ordinary article of commerce or is of specific value or interest to the tariff, or consists of goods which are not easily available in the market. - - In other words, Court may order to deliver specific article only if it is special or unique article, not  available in market. In other cases, Court will order damages but not order specific performance of contract. - - In case of immovable property, normally, specific performance will be ordered, as such property is usually unique. - - Section 12(1) states that Court shall not order performance of part of contract, except in cases specified in that section.

Contracts which cannot be specifically enforced – Following contracts cannot specifically enforced – (a) Where compensation is adequate relief (b) Contract runs into such minute or numerous details or depends on personal qualifications of parties or is such that Court cannot enforce specific performance of its material terms (c) Contract which in its nature is determinable (d) Contract, performance of which involves a continuous duty, which Court cannot supervise. [section 14]. - - In other words, in case of movable articles or contract of intricate nature, specific performance will normally not be ordered by Court. - - Specific performance of contract of personal nature cannot be ordered.

Discretionary powers of Court – Jurisdiction of Court to decree specific performance is discretionary. Court will not order specific performance merely because it is lawful to do so. [section 20(1)]. Court will consider various aspects before issuing decree for specific performance. - - Court can grant compensation in lieu of even in addition to specific performance. [

Other cases when Court can order specific performance – (a) Order rectification of instrument if it does not reflect real intention of parties. This may happen through fraud or mutual mistake. [section 26] (b) Order rescission of contract (section 27) (c) Cancellation of instrument by getting  declared that it is void (section 31

Sale of goods Act 1930

Sale of Goods Act is one of very old mercantile law. Sale of Goods is one of the special types of Contract. Initially, this was part of Indian Contract Act itself in chapter VII (sections 76 to 123). Later these sections in Contract Act were deleted, and separate Sale of Goods Act was passed in 1930.

The Sale of Goods Act is complimentary to Contract Act. Basic provisions of Contract Act apply to contract of Sale of Goods also. Basic requirements of contract i.e. offer and acceptance, legally enforceable agreement, mutual consent, parties competent to contract, free consent, lawful object, consideration etc. apply to contract of Sale of Goods also.

Contract of Sale - A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price. There may be a contract of sale between one part-owner and another. [section 4(1)]. A contract of sale may be absolute or conditional. [section 4(2)]. 

Thus, following are essentials of contract of sale - * It is contract, i.e. all requirements of ‘contract’ must be fulfilled * It is of ‘goods’ * Transfer of property is required * Contract is between buyer and seller * Sale should be for ‘price’ * A part owner can sale his part to another part-owner * Contract may be absolute or conditional.

How Contract of sale is made - A contract of sale is made by an offer to buy or sell goods for a price and the acceptance of such offer. The contract may provide for the immediate delivery of the goods or immediate payment of the price or both, or for the delivery or payment by instalments, or that the delivery or payment or both shall be postponed. [section 5(1)]. Subject to the provisions of any law for the time being in force, a contract of sale may be made in writing or by word of mouth, or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth or may be implied from the conduct of the parties. [section 5(2)]. Thus, credit sale is also a ‘sale’.  - - A verbal contract or contract by conduct of parties is valid. e.g. putting goods in basket in super market  or taking food in a hotel.

Two parties to contract - Two parties are required for contract. - - “Buyer” means a person who buys or agrees to buy goods. [section 2(1)]. “Seller” means a person who sells or agrees to sell goods. [section 2(13)].  A part owner can sale his part to another part-owner. However, if joint owners distribute property among themselves as per mutual agreement, it is not ‘sale’ as there are no two parties.

Contract of Sale includes agreement to sale - Where under a contract of sale the property in the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer, the contract is called a sale, but where the transfer of the property in the goods is to take place at a future time or subject to some condition thereaf­ter to be fulfilled, the contract is called an agreement to sell. [section 4(3)]. An agreement to sell becomes a sale when the time elapses or the conditions are fulfilled subject to which the property in the goods is to be transferred. [section 4(4)]. The provision that contract of sale includes agreement to sale is only for the purposes of rights and liabilities under Sale of Goods Act and not to determine liability of sales tax, which arises only when actual sale takes place.

Transfer of property -  “Property” means the general property in goods, and not merely a special property. [section 2(11)]. In layman’s terms ‘property’ means ‘ownership’. ‘General Property’ means ‘full ownership’. Thus, transfer of ‘general property’  is required to constitute a sale. If goods are given for hire, lease, hire purchase or pledge, ‘general property’ is not transferred and hence it is not a ‘sale’.

Possession and property - Note that ‘property’ and ‘possession’ are not synonymous. Transfer of possession does not mean transfer of property. e.g. - if goods are handed over to transporter or godown keeper, possession is transferred but ‘property’ remains with owner. Similarly, if goods remain in possession of seller after sale transaction is over, the ‘possession’ is with seller, but ‘property’ is with buyer.

Goods - “Goods” means every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money; and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale. [section 2(7)].

Price - “Price” means the money consideration for a sale of goods. [section 2(10)]. Consideration is required for any contract. However, in case of contract of sale of goods, the consideration should be ‘price’ i.e. money consideration. 

Ascertainment of price - The price in a contract of sale may be fixed by the con­tract or may be left to be fixed in manner thereby agreed or may be determined by the course of dealing between the parties. [section 9(1)]. Where the price is not determined in accordance with the foregoing provisions, the buyer shall pay the seller a reasonable price. What is a reasonable price is a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of each particular case. [section 9(2)].

Conditions and Warranties - Opening para of section 16 makes it clear that there is no implied warranty or condition as to quality of fitness of goods for any particular purpose, except those specified in Sale of Goods Act or any other law. - - This is the basic principle of caveat emptor’ i.e. buyer be aware. However, there are certain stipulations which are essential for main purpose of the contract of sale of goods. These go the root of contract and non-fulfilment will mean loss of foundation of contract. These are termed as ‘conditions’. Other stipulations, which are not essential are termed as ‘warranty’. These are collateral to contract of sale of goods. Contract cannot be avoided for breach of warranty, but aggrieved party can claim damages. - - A breach of condition can be treated as breach of warranty, but vice versa is not permissible.

A stipulation in a contract of sale with reference to goods which are the subject thereof may be a condition or a warranty. [section 12(1)]. A condition is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a right to treat the contract as repudiated. [section 12(2)]. A warranty is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a claim for damages but not to a right to reject the goods and treat the contract as repudiated. [section 12(3)]. Whether a stipulation in a contract of sale is a condition or a warranty depends in each case on the construction of the con­tract. A stipulation may be a condition, though called a warranty in the contract. [section 12(4)].

Where a particular stipulation in contract is a condition or warranty depends on the interpretation of terms of contract. Mere stating ‘Conditions of Contract’ in agreement does not mean all stipulations mentioned are ‘conditions’ within meaning of section 12(2).

When condition to be treated as warranty - Where a contract of sale is subject to any condition to be fulfilled by the seller, the buyer may waive the condition or elect to treat the breach of the condition as a breach of warran­ty and not as a ground for treating the contract as repudiated. [section 13(1)]. Where a contract of sale is not severable and the buyer has accepted the goods or part thereof, the breach of any condition to be fulfilled by the seller can only be treated as a breach of warranty and not as a ground for rejecting the goods and treating the contract as repudiated, unless there is a term of the con­tract, express or implied, to that effect. [section 13(2)]. Nothing in this section shall affect the case of any condition or warranty fulfillment of which is excused by law by reason of impossibility or otherwise. [section 13(3)].

Time of payment is not essence of contract but time of delivery of goods is, unless specified otherwise - Unless a different intention appears from the terms of the contract, stipulations as to time of payment are not deemed to be of the essence of a contract of sale. Whether any other stipula­tion as to time is of the essence of the contract or not depends on the terms of the contract. [section 11]. As a general rule, time of payment is not essence of contract, unless there is specific different provision in Contract. In other words, time of payment specified is ‘warranty’. If payment is not made in time, the seller can claim damages but cannot repudiate the contract.

Caveat Emptor - The principle termed as ‘caveat emptor’ means ‘buyer be aware’. Generally, buyer is expected to be careful while purchasing the goods and seller is not liable for any defects in goods sold by him. This principle in basic form is embodied in section 16 that subject to provisions of Sale of Goods Act and any other law, there is no implied condition or warranty  as to quality or fitness of goods for any particular purpose. As per section 2(12), “Quality of goods” includes their state or condition.

Transfer of property as between seller and buyer - Transfer of general property is required in a sale. ‘Property’ means legal ownership. It is necessary to decide whether property in goods has transferred to buyer to determine rights and liabilities of buyer and seller. Generally, risk accompanies property in goods i.e. when property in goods passes, risk also passes. If property in goods has already passed on to buyer, seller cannot stop delivery of goods even if in the meanwhile buyer has become insolvent. - - - Where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods, no property in the goods is transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained. [section 18].

Property passes when intended to pass - Where there is a contract for the sale of specific or ascertained goods the property in them is transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties to the contract intend it to be transferred. [section 19(1)].  For the purpose of ascertaining the intention of the parties regard shall be had to the terms of the contract, the conduct of the parties and the circumstances of the case. [section 19(2)]. Unless a different intention appears, the rules contained in sections 20 to 24 are rules for ascertaining the intention of the parties as to the time at which the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer. [section 19(3)].

Specific goods in a deliverable state - Where there is an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, the property in the goods passes to the buyer when the contract is made, and it is immate­rial whether the time of payment of the price or the time of delivery of the goods, or both, is postponed. [section 20].

Auction sale - Auction sale is special mode of sale. The sale is made in open after making public announcement. Buyers assemble and make offers on the spot. Person offering to pay highest price gets the goods. Usually, auctioneer is appointed to conduct auction. Higher and higher bids are offered and sale is complete when auctioneer accepts a bid.- - - In the case of a sale by auction— (1) where goods are put up for sale in lots, each lot is prima facie deemed to be the subject of a separate contract of sale; (2) the sale is complete when the auctioneer announces its completion by the fall of the hammer or in other customary man­ner; and, until such announcement is made, any bidder may retract his bid; (3) a right to bid may be reserved expressly by or on behalf of the seller and, where such right is expressly so re­served, but not otherwise, the seller or any one person on his behalf may, subject to the provisions hereinafter contained, bid at the auction;  (4) where the sale is not notified to be subject to a right to bid on behalf of the seller, it shall not be lawful for the seller to bid himself or to employ any person to bid at such sale, or for the auctioneer knowingly to take any bid from the seller or any such person; and any sale contravening this rule may be treated as fraudulent by the buyer; (5) the sale may be notified to be subject to a reserved or upset price; (6) if the seller makes use of pretended bidding to raise the price, the sale is voidable at the option of the buyer. [section 64].

Delivery of goods to buyer - The Act makes elaborate provisions regarding delivery of goods to buyer. It is the duty of the seller to deliver the goods and of the buyer to accept and pay for them, in accordance with the terms of the contract of sale. [section 31]. Unless otherwise agreed, delivery of the goods and payment of the price are concurrent conditions, that is to say, the seller shall be ready and willing to give possession of the goods to the buyer in exchange for the price, and the buyer shall be ready and willing to pay the price in exchange for possession of the goods. [section 32]. - - Note that this is ‘unless otherwise agreed’, i.e. buyer and seller can agree to different provisions in respect of payment and delivery.

Acceptance of goods by buyer - Contract of Sale is completed not by mere delivery of goods but by acceptance of goods by buyer. ‘Acceptance’ does not mean mere receipt of goods. It means checking the goods to ascertain whether they are as per contract. - - -  Where goods are delivered to the buyer which he has not previously examined, he is not deemed to have accepted them unless and until he has had a reasonable opportunity of examining them for the purpose of ascertaining whether they are in conform­ity with the contract. [section 41(1)]. - - Unless otherwise agreed, when the seller tenders delivery of goods to the buyer, he is bound, on request, to afford the buyer a reasonable opportunity of examining the goods for the purpose of ascertaining whether they are in conformity with the contract. [section 41(2)].

Buyer’s and Seller’s duties  - The Act casts various duties and grants certain rights on both buyer and seller.

Rights of unpaid seller against the goods - After goods are sold and property is transferred to buyer, the only remedy with seller is to approach Court, if the buyer does not pay. Seller has no right to take forceful possession of goods from buyer, once property in goods is transferred to him. However, the Act gives some rights to seller if his dues are not paid.

Suits for breach of the contract - Unpaid seller can exercise his rights to the extent explained above. In addition, seller can exercise following rights in case of breach of contract. Buyer has also rights in case of breach of contract.

Measure for compensation and  damages – The Sale of Goods Act does not specify how to measure damages. However, since the Act is complimentary to Contract Act, measure of compensation and damages will be as provided in sections 73 and 74 of Contract Act

Registration Act1908

The main purpose for which the Act was designed was to ensure information about all deals concerning land so that correct land records could be maintained. The Act is used for proper recording of transactions relating to other immovable property also. The Act provides for registration of other documents also, which can give these documents more authenticity. Registering authorities have been provided in all the districts for this purpose.

Note that this registration is entirely different from registration of charge done by Registrar of Companies under Companies Act. If the charge relates to immovable property, registration with Registrar (appointed by State Government) under Registration Act and registration under Companies Act with ROC are both required.

Documents of which registration is compulsory - Registration of documents relating to immovable property is compulsory. Registration of will is optional.

Documents not requiring registration - Some documents though related to immovable property are not required to be registered. These are given in section 17(2) of the Act.

Time of presentation for registration - Document should be submitted for registration within 4 months from date of execution [section 23]. Decree or order of Court can be submitted within four months from the day it becomes final. If document is executed by several persons at different times, it may be presented for registration within 4 months from date of each execution [section 24]. If a document is executed abroad by some of the parties, it can be presented for registration within four months after its arrival in India [section 26].

Re-registration - If a person finds that a document has been filed for registration by a person who is not empowered to do so, he can present the document for re-registration within 4 months from the date he became aware of the fact that registration of document is invalid [section 23A].

Where document should be registered - Document relating to immovable property should be registered in the office of Sub-Registrar of sub-district within which the whole or some portion of property is situated [section 28]. Other document can be registered in the office of Sub-Registrar where all persons executing the document desire it to be registered [section 29]. A Registrar can accept a document which is registerable with sub-registrar who is subordinate to him [section 30(1)]. Document should be presented for registration at the office of Registrar/Sub-Registrar. However, in special case, the officer may attend residence of any person to accept a document or will [section 31].

All persons executing document must appear before Registrar - All persons executing the document or their representatives, assigns or agents holding power of attorney must appear before registering officer [section 34(1)]. They have to admit execution and sign the document in presence of Registrar, as required under section 58(1)(a). Appearance may be simultaneous or at different times [section 34(2)]. If some of the persons are unable to appear within 4 months, further time upto additional 4 months can be given on payment of fine upto 10 times the proper registration fee [proviso to section 34(1)].

If document relates to transfer of ownership of immovable property, passport size photograph and finger prints of each buyer and seller of such property shall be affixed to document. [proviso to section 32A]. The Registrar is required to ensure that these are endorsed on the document.

Registration by Registering Officer - If the Registering Officer is satisfied about identity of persons and if they admit about execution of documents, and after registration fees are paid, the registering officer will register the document [section 35(1)]. He will make necessary entries in the Register maintained by him.

Certification of registration - After all formalities are complete, the Registering Officer will endorse the document with word ‘Registered’, and sign the same. The endorsement will be copied in Register. After registration, the document will be returned to the person who presented the document [section 61].

Effective date of document - A document takes effect from its date of execution and not from date of registration. However, if the document states that it will be effective from a particular date, it will be effective from that date [section 47].

Document registered has priority over oral agreement - Any non-testamentary document registered under the Act takes effect against any oral agreement relating to the property. The only exceptions are : (a) If possession of property (movable or immovable) is delivered on basis of such oral agreement and such delivery of possession is valid transfer under any law (b) Mortgage by deposit of title deeds takes effect against any mortgage deed subsequently executed and registered which relates to same property [section 48].

Effect of non-registration - If a document which is required to be registered under section 17 or under provisions of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is not registered, the effect is that such un-registered document * does not affect any immovable property comprised therein * cannot be received as evidence of any transaction affecting such property. - - - Thus, the document becomes redundant and useless for all practical purposes.  It can be accepted as evidence in criminal proceedings.

limition Act

It is for general welfare that a period be put on litigation. Further, it is a general principle of law that law is made to protect only diligent and vigilant people. Equity aids the vigilant and not the indolent. Law will not protect people who are careless about their rights. (Vigilantibus non domientibus jur A subventiunt). Moreover, there should be certainty in law and matters cannot be kept in suspense indefinably. It is, therefore, provided that Courts of Law cannot be approached beyond fixed period. In civil matters, the limit is provided in Limitation Act, 1963.

Bar of limitation – Subject to provisions of sections 4 to 24 of the Act (i.e. Limitation Act),every suit instituted, appeal preferred and application made after the ‘prescribed period’ shall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence. [section 3(1)]. - - ‘Period of limitation’ means the period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by the schedule to the Act and ‘prescribed period’ means the period of limitation computed as per provisions of the Act. [section 2(j)].

Period as  prescribed in Schedule to the Act – The period has been prescribed in Schedule to the Act. Generally, it is as follows – (a) 3 years for a suit relating to accounts, contracts, declarations, decrees, suits relating to movable property, recovery of law suit under a contract etc. (b) 12 years for suits relating to possession of immovable property and 30 years for mortgaged property (c) One year for suit relating to torts (3 years for compensation in certain cases (d) 30 to 90 days in case of appeals under Civil Procedure Code and Criminal Procedure Code. - - Period of filing appeal and application can be extended if proper cause is shown (but not the suit) [section 5].

If court is closed on last day – If court is closed on last day of limitation, suit, appeal or application can be filed on next day when Court reopens. [section 4].

Continuous running of time – When once period of limitation starts running, it continues even if there is any subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application. [section 9]. - - However, if at the time when person is entitled to file a suit or make application, if a person was disabled (as he was minor or insane), the period of limitation will start after the disability is removed. [section 6(1)].

In case of appeals against any judgment, if limitation is provided in any statute, that will prevail.

Computation of period of limitation – (a) First day or day of judgment is to be excluded. [section 12(1)]. (b) Time for getting copy of judgment or decree or order or award (against which appeal or application has to be filed is to be excluded. [section 12(3)]. (c) Time when leave to sue or appeal as pauper is applied for and is pending [section 13]. (d) Time spent (by mistake or misunderstanding) in proceeding bona fide in the Court without jurisdiction [section 14]. (e) If stay or injunction was granted, that period will be excluded. [section 15(1)]. (f) If consent/sanction of Government or some authority was required to be obtained for filing suit/application or notice was required to be given to Government in accordance with law, the period spent in obtaining the consent/sanction or time in giving notice is excluded. [section 15(2)].

Effect of fraud or mistake – Period of limitation starts only after fraud or mistake is discovered by affected party. [section 17(1)]. In Vidarbha Veneer Industries Ltd. v. UOI - 1992 (58) ELT 435 (Bom HC) , it was held that limitation starts from the date of knowledge of mistake of law. It may be even 100 years from date of payment. - - - - The cardinal principal enshrined in section 17 of Limitation Act is that fraud nullifies everything. Thus, appeal against the party can be admitted beyond limitation, if party has committed fraud (in submitting non-genuine documents at adjudication in this case) – CC v. Candid Enterprises 2001(130) ELT 404 (SC 3 member bench).

Effect of acknowledgment in writing – If acknowledgment of any property is right or liability is obtained in writing duly signed by the party against whom such property, right or liability is claimed, before the expiration of period of limitation, a fresh period of limitation is computed from date of acknowledgment. [section 18(1)], Acknowledgment can be signed either personally or by an agent duty authorised in this behalf. [section 18(2)]. [That is why Banks and Financial Institutions insist on confirmation of balance every year].

Continuing breaches and torts – In case of continuous breaches and torts, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment of time during which the breach or tort continues. [section 22].

Limitation is a question of law and can be raised at any stage i.e. even at the time of appeal.

Law of limitation only bars remedy, but does not extinguish the right - In Bombay Dyeing and Mfg Co. Ltd. v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 328 = 1958 SCR 1122 (SC Constitution Bench), it was held that the law of limitation only bars the remedy of approaching the court of law. However, it does not extinguish the right as such.

Law of Limitation is applicable only to courts and not to tribunals. - Nityanand M Joshi v. LIC - AIR 1970 SC 209 = (1970) 1 SCR 396 = 36 FJR 324 (SC) * Sakura v. Tanaji - AIR 1985 SC 1279 * Birla Cement Works v. G M Western Railway (1995) 2 JT 59 (SC).

Limitation in criminal matters - As per section 468 of Cr PC, Court cannot take cognizance of offence after expiry of following limitation period - (a) Six months, if the offence is punishable only with fine (b) One year, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year (c) three years, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years. However, in case of economic offences, there is no time limit.

indian trusts Act 1882

Trust and trustees is a concurrent subject [Entry 10 of List III of Seventh Schedule to Constitution]. - - Thus, the Act will apply all over India except when specifically amended / altered by any State Government.

The Indian Trusts Act was passed in 1882 to define law relating to private trusts and trustees. - - A trust is not a 'legal person'. Property of trust is held in name of trustee for benefit of beneficiary.

What is a trust - A trust is an obligation annexed to the ownership of property and arising out of a confidence reposed in and accepted by the owner, or declared and accepted by him, for the benefit of another, or of another and the owner. [section 3 para 1]. The person who reposes the confidence is called 'author of trust' (testator), the person who accepts the confidence is called 'trustee' and the person for whose benefit the confidence is accepted is 'beneficiary'. The subject matter of trust is called 'trust property' or ‘trust-money. The ‘beneficial interest’ or ‘interest of the beneficiary’ is his right against the trustee as the owner of trust-property. The instrument by which trust is declared is called as ‘instrument of trust’. [section 3 para 2].

Thus, when a property is held by one person as trustee for the benefit of another, it can be regarded as a trust. Trusts are governed by Indian Trust Act, as may be modified by State Governments.

A trust can be created for any lawful purpose. [section 4]. A trust can be created by deed, will or even word of mouth. However, trust of immovable property can be created only by non-testamentary instrument signed by author of trust and is registered, or by will of author. [section 5].  Thus, ‘will’ is not required to be registered, even if it pertains to immovable property.

Duties of trustees - Trustee is not bound to accept the trust. [section 10].  However, once accepted, he cannot renounce it except permission of civil court or beneficiary (if he is major) or by virtue of special power in the instrument of trust. [section 46]. -  Once trustee accepts trust, he is bound to fulfil the purpose of trust and to obey directions given at the time of creation of the trust. It can be modified with consent of beneficiary. [section 11]. His duties are - * Inform himself of state of trust property (section12) * Protect title to trust property (section 13) * Not to set up title adverse to beneficiary (section 14) * Take care of property as a man of ordinary prudence would deal with such property as own property (section 15) Conversion of perishable property to permanent and immediately profitable character (section 16) * To be impartial (section 17) * To prevent waste (section 18) * Keep proper accounts and information (section 19) and * Invest trust-money in prescribed securities and not others (section 20). - - Trustee is liable for breach of trust. [section 23]. ‘Breach of trust’ means a breach of duty imposed on a trustee, as such, by any law for the time being in force. [section 3 para 3].

Rights and Powers of trustee – Trustee has following powers - * Rights to title deed (section 31) * Right to reimbursement of expenses (section 32) * Right to indemnify from gainer by breach of trust (section 33) * Right to apply to court for opinion on management of trust property (section 34) * Right to settlement of accounts (section 35) * All acts necessary and reasonable and proper for trust property or protection of beneficiary (section 36). * Power to covey property when he is authorised to sell (section 39) * Power to vary investments (from one security to another (section 40) * Power to apply property of minors for their maintenance (section 41) * Power to give receipts (section 42) * Power to compound or compromise (section 43).

Rights and liabilities of beneficiary – The beneficiary has * rights to rent and profits (section 55) * Right to specific execution of intention of author of trust (section 56) * Right to inspect and take copies of instrument of trust, accounts etc. (section 57) * Right to transfer beneficial interest (section 58) * Right to sue for execution of trust (section 59) * Right to proper trustees (section 60) * Right to compel trustee to perform an act of duty * Follow trust property into hands of third persson and into which it has been converted (section 63). - - A beneficiary is liable if he joins in breach of trust. [section 68].

Revocation of trust - A trust created by will can be revoked at the pleasure of testator. A trust created otherwise by will can be revoked (a) by consent of all beneficiaries if they are competent to contract (b) In exercise of power of revocation expressly reserved by author of trust, if the trust has been declared by a non-testatory instrument or by word of mouth or (c) At pleasure of author of trust, if the trust is for payment of debts and the author of trust has not communicated to the creditors. [section 78].

indian stamp Act 1899

The basic purpose of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 is to raise revenue to Government. However, over a period of time, the stamped document has obtained so much value that a ‘stamped document’ is considered much more authentic and reliable than an un-stamped document.

Power of Parliament in respect of stamp duty - Parliament can make law in respect of Stamp Duty. It can prescribe rates of stamp duty. The stamp duty rates prescribed by Parliament in respect of bill of exchange, cheques, transfer of shares etc. will prevail all over India. However, other stamp duty rates prescribed by Parliament in Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (e.g. stamp duty on agreements, affidavit, articles of association of a company, partnership deed, lease deed, mortgage, power of attorney, security bond etc.) are valid only for Union territories. In case of States, the rates prescribed by individual States will prevail in those States.

Powers of State Government of Stamp Duty - State Government has powers to fix stamp duties on all documents except bill of exchange, cheques etc. Rates prescribed by State Government will prevail in that State. State Government can make law for other aspects of stamp duty also (i.e. matters other than quantum of duty). However, if there is conflict between State law and Union law, the Union law prevails [Article 254 of Constitution].

Instruments chargeable to stamp duty - Instrument includes every document by which any right or liability, is, or purported to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded [section 2(17) of Indian Stamp Act]. Any instrument mentioned in Schedule I to Indian Stamp Act is chargeable to duty as prescribed in the schedule [section 3]. The list includes all usual instruments like affidavit, lease, memorandum and articles of company, bill of exchange, bond, mortgage, conveyance, receipt, debenture, share, insurance policy, partnership deed, proxy, shares etc. Thus, if an instrument is not listed in the schedule, no stamp duty is payable. ‘Instrument’ does not include ordinary letters. Similarly, an unsigned draft of an agreement is not an ‘instrument’.

Duty payable when several instruments - In case of sale, mortgage or settlement, if there are several instruments for one transaction, stamp duty is payable only on one instrument. On other instruments, nominal stamp duty of Re. 1 is payable [section 4(1)]. If one instrument relates to several distinct matters, stamp duty payable is aggregate amount of stamp duties payable on separate instruments [section 5]. However, it may happen that one instrument covering only one matter can come under more than one descriptions given in Schedule to Stamp Act. In such case, highest rate specified among the different heads will prevail [section 6].

Powers to reduce stamp duty - Government can reduce or remit whole or part of duties payable. Such reduction or remission can be in respect of whole or part of territories and also can be for particular class of persons. Government can also compound or consolidate duties in case of issue of shares or debentures by companies [section 9(1)]. ‘Government’ means Central Government in respect of stamp duties on bills of exchange, cheque, receipts etc. and ‘State Government’ in case of stamp duties on other documents [section 9(2)].

Mode of payment of stamp duty - The payment of stamp duty can be made by adhesive stamps or impressed stamps. Instrument executed in India must be stamped before or at the time of execution (section 17). Instrument executed out of India can be stamped within three months after it is first received in India [section 18(1)]. However, in case of bill of exchange or promissory note made out of India, it should be stamped by first holder in India before he presents for payment or endorses or negotiates in India [section 19].

Valuation for stamp duty - In some cases, stamp duty is payable on ad valorem basis i.e. on basis of value of property etc. In such cases, value is decided on prescribed basis.

Adjudication as to stamp duty payable - Adjudication means determining the duty payable. Normally, the person paying the duty himself may decide the stamp duty payable and pay accordingly. However, in cases of complex documents, the person paying the duty may not be sure of the stamp duty payable. In such case, he can apply for opinion of Collector. He has to apply with draft document and prescribed fees. Collector will determine the stamp duty payable as per his judgment [section 31(1)].

What is meant by ‘duly stamped’ - ‘Duly stamped’ means that the instrument bears an adhesive or impressed stamp not less than proper amount and that such stamp has been affixed or used in accordance with law in force in India [section 2(11)]. In case of adhesive stamps, the stamps have to be effectively cancelled so that they cannot be used again. Similarly, impressed stamps have to be written in such a way that it cannot be used for other instrument and stamp appears on face of instrument. If stamp is not so used, the instrument is treated as ‘un-stamped’. Similarly, when stamp duty paid is not adequate, the document is treated as ‘not duly stamped’.

Instrument cannot be accepted as evidence if not duly stamped - An instrument not ‘duly stamped’ cannot be accepted as evidence by civil court, an arbitrator or any other authority authorised to receive evidence. However, the document can be accepted as evidence in criminal court.

Case when short payment is by mistake - If non-payment or short payment of stamp duty is by accident, mistake or urgent necessity, the person can himself produce the document to Collector within one year. In such case, Collector may receive the amount and endorse the document that proper duty has been paid [section 41].

Stamp duty on Receipt - Stamp Duty on receipt is Re. 1 for receipt above Rs. 5,000. Receipt includes any note, memorandum or writing [whether signed by any person or not] (a) where any money, or any bill of exchange or promissory note is acknowledged to have been received or (b) where any other movable property is acknowledged to have been received in satisfaction of a debt or (c) whereby any debt or demand is acknowledged to have been satisfied or discharged or (d) which signifies or indicates any such acknowledgment [section 2(23)].

Stamp duty on transfer of shares in a company or body corporate - It is 50 Paise for every hundred rupees or part thereof of the value of share. [It is 75 Ps as per Article 62 of Schedule I to Stamp Act, reduced to 50 Ps per Rs 100 vide notification No. SO 198(E) dated 16.3.1976]. As per section 21, the duty has to be calculated on the basis of market price prevalent on date of instrument and not on the face value of shares.

Stamp Duty on transfer in Depository Scheme - If the company issues securities to one or more depositories, it will have to pay stamp duty on total amount of security issued by it and such securities need not be stamped. [section 8A(a) of Stamp Act]. If an investor opts out of depository scheme, the securities surrendered to Depository will be issued to him in form of a certificate. Such share certificate should be stamped as if a 'duplicate certificate’ has been issued. [section 8A(1)(b) of Indian Stamp Act]. If securities are purchased or sold under depository scheme, no stamp duty is payable.

indin partnership Act 1932

The Indian Partnership Act was passed in 1932 to define and amend the law relating to partnership. Indian Partnership Act is one of very old mercantile law. Partnership is one of the special types of Contract. Initially, this was part of Indian Contract Act itself (Chapter IX - sections 239 to 266), but later converted into separate Act in 1932.

The Indian Partnership Act is complimentary to Contract Act. Basic provisions of Contract Act apply to contract of partnership also. Basic requirements of contract i.e. legally enforceable agreement, mutual consent, parties competent to contract, free consent, lawful object, consideration etc. apply to partnership contract also.

Partnership Contract is a ‘concurrent subject’ - ‘Contract, including partnership contract’ is a ‘concurrent subject, covered in Entry 7 of List III (Seventh Schedule to Constitution). Indian Partnership Act is a Central Act, but State Government can also pass legislation on this issue. Though Partnership Act is a Central Act, it is administered by State Governments, i.e. work of registration of firms and related matters is looked after by each State Government. The Act is not applicable to Jammu and Kashmir.

Unlimited liability is major disadvantage - The major disadvantage of partnership is the unlimited liability of partners for the debts and liabilities of the firm. Any partner can bind the firm and the firm is liable for all liabilities incurred by any firm on behalf of the firm. If property of partnership firm is insufficient to meet liabilities, personal property of any partner can be attached to pay the debts of the firm.

Partnership Firm is not a legal entity -  It may be surprising but true that a Partnership Firm is not a legal entity. It has limited identity for purpose of tax law. As per section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932, 'partnership' is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any one of them acting for all. - - Under partnership law, a partnership firm is not a legal entity, but only consists of individual partners for the time being. It is not a distinct legal entity apart from the partners constituting it - Malabar Fisheries Co. v. CIT (1979) 120 ITR 49 = 2 Taxman 409 (SC).

Firm legal entity for purpose of taxation - For tax law, income-tax as well as sales tax, partnership firm is a legal entity - State of Punjab v. Jullender Vegetables Syndicate - 1966 (17) STC 326 (SC) * CIT v. A W Figgies - AIR 1953 SC 455 * CIT v. G Parthasarthy Naidu (1999) 236 ITR 350 = 104 Taxman 197 (SC). Though a partnership firm is not a juristic person, Civil Procedure Code enables the partners of a partnership firm to sue or to be sued in the name of the firm. - Ashok Transport Agency v. Awadhesh Kumar 1998(5) SCALE 730 (SC). [A partnership firm can sue only if it is registered].

Partnership, partner, firm and firm name -  “Partnership” is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of business carried on by all or any to them acting for all. - - Persons who have entered into partnership with one another are called individually “partners” and collectively “a firm”, and the name under which their business is carried on is called the “firm name”. [section 4].

“Business” includes every trade, occupation and profes­sion. [section 2(b)]. Thus, a ‘partnership’ can be formed only with intention to share profits of business. People coming together for some social or philanthropic or religious purposes do not constitute ‘partnership’.

Partners are Mutual agents - The business of firm can be carried on by all or any of them for all. Any partner has authority to bind the firm. Act of any one partner is binding on all the partners. Thus, each partner is ‘agent’ of all the remaining partners. Hence, partners are ‘mutual agents’.

Oral or written agreement - As per normal provision of contract, a ‘partnership’ agreement can be either oral or written. - - Agreement in writing is necessary to get the firm registered. Similarly, written agreement is required, if the firm wants to be assessed as ‘partnership firm’ under Income Tax Act.  A written agreement is advisable to establish existence of partnership and to prove rights and liabilities of each partner, as it is difficult to prove an oral agreement. - - However, written agreement is not essential under Indian Partnership Act.

Sharing of profit necessary - The partners must come together to share profits. Thus, if one member gets only fixed remuneration (irrespective of profits) or one who gets only interest and no profit share at all, is not a ‘partner’. - - Similarly, sharing of receipts or collections (without any relation to profits earned) is not ‘sharing of profit’ and the association is not ‘partnership’. For example, agreement to share rents collected or percentage of tickets sold is not ‘partnership’, as sharing of profits is not involved. - - The share need not be in proportion to funds contributed by each partner. - - Interestingly, though sharing of profit is essential, sharing of losses is not an essential condition for partnership . - - Similarly, contribution of capital is not essential to become partner of a firm.

Number of partners - Since partnership is ‘agreement’ there must be minimum two partners. The Partnership Act does not put any restrictions on maximum number of partners. However, section 11 of Companies Act prohibits partnership consisting of more than 20 members, unless it is registered as a company or formed in pursuance of some other law.

Mode of determining existence of partnership - In determining whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm, regard shall be had to the real relation between the parties, as shown by all relevant facts taken together. [section 6].

Mutual agency is the real test - The real test of ‘partnership firm’ is ‘mutual agency’, i.e. whether a partner can bind the firm by his act, i.e. whether he can act as agent of all other partners.

Partnership at will - Where no provision is made by contract between the partners for the duration of their partnership, or for the determination of their partnership, the partnership is “partnership at will”. [section 7]. - - Partnership ‘at will’ means any partner can dissolve a firm by giving notice to other partners (or he may express his intention to retire from partnership) - - Partnership deed may provide about duration of partnership (say 10 years) or how partnership will be brought to end. In absence of any such term, the partnership is ‘at will’. - - In case of ‘particular partnership’, the partnership comes to end when the venture for which it was formed comes to end.

Determination of rights and duties of partners by contract be­tween the partners - Subject to the provisions of this Act, the mutual rights and duties of the partners of a firm may be determined by con­tract between the partners, and such contract may be express or may be implied by a course of dealing. - - Such contract may be varied by consent of all the partners, and such consent may be express or may be implied by a course of dealing. [section 11(1)]. - - Thus, partners are free to determine the mutual rights and duties by contract. Such contract may be in writing or it may be implied by their actions.

Dutiesand mutual rights  of partners - Subject to contract to contrary, partners have duties and mutual rights as specified in Partnership Act-

Every partner has right to take part in business - Subject to contract between partners (to the contrary), every partner has right to take part in the conduct of the business. [section 12(a)]. - - Thus, every partner has equal right to take active part in business, unless there is specific contract to the contrary. Even if authority of a partner is restricted by contract, outside party is not likely to be aware of such restriction. In such case, if such partner acts within the apparent authority, the firm will be liable for his acts.

The property of the firm - Subject to contract between the partners, the property of the firm includes all property and rights and interests in property originally brought into the stock of the firm, or acquired, by purchase or otherwise, by or for the firm, or for the purposes and in the course of the business of the firm, and includes also the goodwill of the business. - - Unless the contrary intention appears, property and rights and interests in property acquired with money belonging to the firm are deemed to have been acquired for the firm [section 14].

Partner to be agent of the firm - Subject to the provisions of this Act, a partner is the agent of the firm for the purposes of the business of the firm. [section 18].

Implied authority of partner as agent of the firm - Subject to the provisions of section 22, the act of a partner which is done to carry on, in the usual way, business of the kind carried on by the firm, binds the firm. The authority of a partner to bind the firm conferred by this section is called his “implied authority”. [section 19(1)]. -

Partners jointly and severally liable acts of the firm - Every partner is liable, jointly with all the other partners and also severally, for all acts of the firm done while he is a part­ner. [section 25]. ‘An act of a firm’ means any act or omission by all the partners, or by any partner or agent of the firm which gives rise to a right enforceable by or against the firm [section 2(a)]. ‘Joint and several’ means each partner is liable for all acts. Thus, if amount due cannot be recovered from other partners, any one partner will be liable for payment of entire dues of the firm.

Partner by Holding out - ‘Holding out’ means giving impression that a person is partner though he is not. This is principle of ‘estoppel’. If a person gives an impression to outsiders that he is partner of firm though he is not partner, he will he held liable as partner, if third party deals with the firm on the impression that he is a partner. Similarly, if a person retires from the firm but does not give notice of retirement, he will be liable as a partner, if some third party deals with the firm on the assumption that he is still partner.

Minors admitted to the benefits of partnership - A person who is a minor according to the law to which he is subject may not be a partner in a firm, but, with the consent of all the partners for the time being, he may be admitted to the benefits of partnership. [section 30(1)].

Rights of minor - Minor (who is admitted to benefit of partnership) has a right to such share of the property and of the profits of the firm as may be agreed upon and he may have access to and inspect and copy any of the accounts of the firm. [section 30(2)]. [Since the word used is ‘may’, it seems that right of minor to inspect accounts can be restricted by agreement among partners].

Minor’s share liable but not minor himself - Such minor’s share is liable for the acts of the firm, but the minor is not personally liable for any such act. [section 30(3)].

Reconstitution of a Partnership Firm - A partnership firm is not a legal entity. It has no perpetual existence as in case of a company incorporated under Companies Act. However, the Act gives the partnership limited rights of continuity of business despite change of partners. In absence of specific provision in partnership deed, death or insolvency of a partner means dissolution of the firm. However, partnership can provide that the firm will not dissolve in such case.

Change in partners may occur due to various reasons like death, retirement, admission of new member, expulsion, insolvency, transfer of interest by partner etc. After such change, the rights and liabilities of each partner are determined afresh. This is termed as reconstitution of a firm.

Dissolution of a Firm - A partnership firm is an ‘organisation’ and like every ‘organ’ it has to either grow or perish. Thus, dissolution of a firm is inevitable part in the life of partnership firm some time or the other.

Dissolution of a firm without intervention of Court can be (a) By agreement (section 40) (b) Compulsory dissolution in case of insolvency (section 41) (c) Dissolution on happening of certain contingency (section 42) (d) By notice if partnership is at will (section 43).

A firm can also be dissolved by Court u/s 44.

Dissolution of partnership and dissolution of firm - The dissolution of partnership between all the partners of a firm is called the dissolution of the firm. [section 39]. - - . As per section 4, Partnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share profits of business carried on by all or any of them acting for all. - - Thus, if some partner is changed/added/ goes out, the ‘relation’ between them changes and hence ‘partnership’ is dissolved, but the ‘firm’ continues. Hence, the change is termed as ‘reconstitution of firm’. However, complete breakage between relations of all partners is termed as ‘dissolution of firm’. After such dissolution, the firm no more exists. Thus, ‘Dissolution of partnership’ is different from ‘dissolution of firm’. ‘Dissolution of partnership’ is only reconstruction of firm, while ‘dissolution of firm’ means the firm no more exists after dissolution.

Mode of dissolution of firm - Following are various modes of dissolution of firm. * Dissolution by agreement - [section 40]. * Compulsory dissolution in case of insolvency - [section 41] * Dissolution on the happening on certain contingencies [section 42] * Dissolution by notice of partnership at will  [section 43(2)] * Dissolution by the court

Consequences of dissolution of firm - After firm is dissolved, business is wound up and proceeds are distributed among partners. The Act specifies what are the consequences of dissolution of a firm.

Sale of goodwill of firm after dissolution - Business is attracted due to reputation of a firm. It creates a ‘brand image’ which is valuable though not tangible. ‘Goodwill’ is the value of reputation of the business of the firm. Goodwill of a firm is sold after dissolution either separately or along with property of firm. - - As per section 14, property of partnership firm includes goodwill of the firm. - - Goodwill is the reputation and connections which the firm establishes over time, together with circumstances which make the connections durable. This reputation enable to earn profits more than normal profits which a similar business would have earned. Goodwill is an intangible asset of the firm.  - -

In settling the accounts of a firm after dissolution, the goodwill shall, subject to contract between the partners, be included in the assets, and it may be sold either separately or along with other property of the firm. [section 55(1)].

Settlement of accounts after dissolution - Accounts are settled after a firm is dissolved as provided in the Act. A firm is said to be ‘wound up’ only after accounts are fully settled.

Registration of Firms - Registration of firm is not compulsory,  though usually done as registration brings many advantages to the firm. Since ‘partnership contract’  is a ‘Concurrent Subject’ as per Constitution of India, registration of firms and related work is handled by State Government in each State. Section 71 authorises State Government to make rules for * prescribing fees for filing documents with registrar * prescribing forms of various statements and intimations are to be made to registrar and * regulating procedures in the office of Registrar.

Partner cannot sue if firm is unregistered - No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract or conferred by this Act shall be instituted in any court by or on behalf of any person suing as a partner in a firm against the firm or an{ person alleged to be or to`have been a Ápartner in the fir} unless the firm is registered and the person suing!is or has been shown iø the Register of Firms as a partner in the firm.$ [section 69(1)]. - - Thus, a partner cannot sue the firm or any otheÄ ” partner if firm is unregistered. - - If third party files suit against a partner, he cannot claim of set off or institute other proceeding to enforce a right arising from a contract. - - Suit or claim or set off upto Rs 100 can be made as per section 69(4)(b), but it is negligible in today’s standards. - - Criminal proceedings can be filed, but civil suit is not permissible.

Unregistered Firm cannot sue third party - No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract shall be instituted in any Court by or on behalf of a firm against any third party unless the firm is registered and the persons suing are or have been shown in the Register of Firms as partners in the firm. [section 69(2)].  - - If third party files suit against the unregistered firm, the firm cannot claim set off or institute other proceeding to enforce a right arising from a contract. - - Suit or claim or set off upto Rs 100 can be made as per section 69(4)(b), but it is negligible in today’s standards. - - Criminal proceedings can be filed, but civil suit is not permissible